Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions
III) While in the Edition in the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second Edition) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed for the petitioner and others was simple existence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon because of the prosecution against the petitioner and his earlier mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined with the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fire-arm injury which was fatal to your deceased was caused from the petitioner but in support of opinion on the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is obtainable on the file and mere ipsi dixit of police will not be binding about the Court.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
“Guaranteeing the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple trustworthy sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی more info گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
If a target is shot at point-blank assortment, it may well still be fair to infer that the accused intended death. However, that just isn't always the case.
6. Mere involvement in a very heinous offence is no ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled with the concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, due to the fact then he is guiding the bars, he is previous non-convict, never involved in almost any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is no more expected for further investigation, therefore, his constant incarceration would not provide any advantageous purpose at this stage.
P.C. Liability of petitioners with the said offences would be determined with the figured out trial Court after sifting the evidentiary worth from the material made before the same. Till then, case of
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request to your appellate court.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.